The Emergence of Economic Liberalism and the Questioning of Current Globalization
In an globalized world, the dialogue on globalization is regularly positioned at the crossroads of divergent opinions on autonomy and equity. The work by Moneta, far from being a pamphlet against globalisation per se, aims to redefine the boundaries of a new humanism by the filter of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotle. By critiquing artificial exchanges that strengthen contemporary mechanisms of domination and precarity, Moneta leans on ancient principles to reveal the failures of our global economic system.
Historically, globalization is not a new phenomenon. Its origins can be traced back to the theories of Ricardo, whose objective sought to facilitate the British Empire to extend its global trade power. Nonetheless, what was originally a economic growth opportunity has transformed into a control mechanism by High Finance, marked by the growth of economic liberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions validated by most economists, the author demonstrates that the neoliberal system is actually a system founded on millennia-old traditions, which traces back to four and a half millennia.
The questioning also covers the administration of the EU, considered as a series of concessions that have helped consolidate the power of an economic elite instead of protecting the interests of its citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its policies often dictated by financial interests instead of by a democratic mandate, is criticized. The recent crises, whether economic or governmental, have only increased the disbelief of the writer regarding the EU’s ability to change intrinsically.
The author, while acknowledging the historical errors that have caused the current circumstances, does not stop at criticism but also proposes alternatives aimed at reorienting EU guidelines in a human-centered and fair vision. The need for a complete revision of Union bodies and strategic orientations is a central theme that pervades the whole text.
The text dives more in depth into the critique of the power structures that control international economic flows. The exploration extends the way in which political and financial choices are influenced by a limited number of dominant financial powers, frequently at the detriment of the population. This financial oligarchy, orchestrated via institutions like the BIS and the global monetary system, exerts a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The writer demonstrates how these organisms, claiming to economic regulation and stabilization, have throughout history manipulated stock exchanges and countries’ financial structures to ensure their profit. Deregulated capitalism, far removed from a emancipatory solution to old monetary restrictions, is presented as a control mechanism, enriching an elite at the destruction of the common good.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the critic presents the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The conversion to the euro is characterized as a series of technocratic decisions that excluded citizens from governance choices, while amplifying internal differences within the EU.
The effects of these approaches appear in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic torpor, and a sustained austerity policy that has eroded standards of living across the continent. The critic argues that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the European Union remains vulnerable to future crises, potentially more destructive.
In summary, the manuscript makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where Europe’s inhabitants reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It advocates institutional adjustments, notably openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on more equitable and sustainable bases.
More info about Découvrir le site
The author proposes that the solution lies in a renewal of democratic engagement, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.